On 10/5/05, David Baird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If we want to refer to the thing as a request sometimes, and as a > controller other times, that's a further hint that at some point we > should properly separate them. But ATM, I'd prefer to use the same > label for the invocant everywhere (at least, everywhere within a given > package). It probably makes sense to call it $r in most plugins, and > it certainly makes sense to call it 'request' inside templates. I vote > for $self within Maypole.pm because it has heavier emphasis on > controller aspects, and because I think we probably will want to > separate the controller and the request One Day.
$self with Maypole.pm and $r elsewhere works for me - I say we go with that. A. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ Maypole-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/maypole-devel
