On 09/09/2005, at 6:24 AM, Dave Howorth wrote:

Kieren Diment wrote:

Can we get Simon's permission to include this tutorial in the Maypole documentation? At first glance (I'll read it in full later) it looks like it will be invaluable


I think we'd also need permission to alter it and someone to volunteer to edit it, since it doesn't seem to describe the current release of Maypole.

I have permission to put it up on the wiki, and will volunteer to do some edits. The reason that I'm interested in this, is that I was planning to write Maypole::Manual::Beginner. This tutorial goes a long way towards that, but needs clarification for people like me - i.e. someone who is making the move from procedural to oo programming and doesn't identify as a "real computer programmer" (like computer science person) in the first place. As well as making sure that it works with the current release and unimportant stuff like that.


Many new users have been confused by other tutorial material that's out of date and I don't suppose this would be any different. Our first focus should be to complete, update and improve the manual IMHO.



That's a good point. I think that for the Maypole::Manual namespace, the structure makes updating and keeping current difficult. That might be a project for me after there's a tutorial I'm happy with. At the moment, the available tutorials are not current, and/or assume more prior knowledge than I'm comfortable with assuming. We need to make the process of "getting your head around Maypole" a little less byzantine.

kd


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Maypole-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/maypole-users

Reply via email to