As I pointed out on the devel mailing list, I think that the docs for
Maypole have some serious architectural problems that mitigate against
them being updated consistently. I have some thoughts on this, and
hope to have produced something useful soon. One of the problems is
the diversity of locations for the docs, but there are others.
Kieren
On 30/09/2005, at 11:05 AM, Sebastian Riedel wrote:
Am 29.09.2005 um 17:18 schrieb David Baird:
On 9/29/05, Dave Howorth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There's an intriguing new link on CPAN pages now: "Annotate this
POD".
It seems like it might be quite a useful facility for Maypole :) What
does everybody think?
I'm not a fan. We've already got module pod, separate
documentation-only modules, the wiki, and 2 mail lists. We don't need
yet another rapidly out of date source of misinformation ;-/
AnnoCPAN has proven to be a great tool for Catalyst documentation,
because it makes it so easy for people to contribute, and we regularly
merge in annotations.
You should welcome every little helper that saves you work, especially
considered that the Maypole docs have not seen improvements since last
year...
--
sebastian
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads,
discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Maypole-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/maypole-users
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Maypole-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/maypole-users
