-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Roland Illig wrote: > Enrico Weigelt schrieb: >> Hi folks, >> >> is it necessary to have the intl lib bundled into mc or could it >> be taken directly from the system ? >> (I admit, I don't know much about how it really works ;-o) > > I don't think it is necessary. There are many other projects who have > dropped the internal intl/ directory.
If we started to talk about the source tree... What now: config doc edit lib m4 maint po slang src syntax vfs I think, this not good. lib - in my mind must be sources of library(es) of project. What we see in directory lib? doc - Documentation of project, included: - - man pages - - Users manual - - Developers manual (doxygen?) - - Maintainers manual (how make packages on all known OSes, for example) Now in directory 'doc' only manpages... and README-files at all subdirectoryes. My purpose (in far-near future): doc man (current ${src_root}/doc) contributor (contributor manuals) developer (developers manual) user (all README-files, readme about hotkeys, all other user-related) contrib contrib/extfs (current ${src_root}/vfs/extfs) contrib/hints contrib/lib (current ${src_root}/lib, except mc.hint.* and README.xterm) contrib/maint (current ${src_root}/maint) contrib/syntax (current ${src_root}/syntax) lib lib/edit (current ${src_root}/edit) lib/mcglib (may be, needed as mcslang for embedded systems... Little internal library... but it's only thinks) lib/slang lib/vfs lib/vfs/samba m4 po src WBR, Slavaz. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJWzU2b3oGR6aVLpoRAhsuAJ914GDP2/6kAPx53GQgzQ86QBFLOQCfXupQ 2WJiflZRaGvsv7CY80Rt/TM= =a/Gh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel