* Andrew Borodin <aboro...@vmail.ru> schrieb: Hi,
> > First tiny step to get rid if glib. > > It's very strange. Do you think than mc must be free of glib? Yes, because glib is a fat blob we don't really need (the few things we currently use can be easily done w/ a bunch of macros or inline's). Isn't it rather absurd to maintain an stripped-down branch of slang for embedded systems, but at the same time import glib ? ;-O cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: http://patches.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
