On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:11:56 +0100 Enrico Weigelt wrote: > * Andrew Borodin schrieb: > > > First tiny step to get rid if glib. > > > > It's very strange. Do you think than mc must be free of glib? > > Yes, because glib is a fat blob we don't really need (the few > things we currently use can be easily done w/ a bunch of > macros or inline's).
Other developers are disagree with you. glib provides many useful functions and data structures and allows us do not reinvent the wheel. And glib is portable library. > Isn't it rather absurd to maintain an stripped-down branch of > slang for embedded systems, but at the same time import glib ? ;-O mc for embedded systems can be linked statically. -- Regards, Andrew. _______________________________________________ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel