Nicola Larosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté : > > I am not sure if MC will ever compete on the Windows world with other > > alternatives (I have not kept track of the alternatives on Windows > > myself), > > The best one I know of is Windows Commander ( http://www.ghisler.com/ > ). It is commercial, but is probably the better Norton Commander clone > I ever saw, probably better than MC.
Commercial does not means proprietary. Free Software can be "free as beer" but it means free as freedom. And so, it can be commercialized. For instance, while RedHat sells a distribution, it can be seen as commercialization of software and it's still Free Software. Anyway, what makes this "Windows Commander" so better than the others? What are the interesting features that mc should have too? -- Mathieu Roy << Profile << http://savannah.gnu.org/users/yeupou << >> Homepage >> http://yeupou.coleumes.org >> << GPG Key << http://gpg.coleumes.org << _______________________________________________ Mc mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc
