On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Thomas Dickey wrote: > On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Pavel Tsekov wrote: > >> Do you mind to post a reference to that discussion so it can be verified ? > > Here's another (though I still don't see the particular one I had in mind) > > http://groups.google.com/group/linux.debian.bugs.dist/browse_frm/thread/a6ae02f59bed4d8f/66481938acc67375?lnk=st&q=(ncurses+OR+xterm+OR+vttest+OR+cproto+OR+diffstat+OR+terminfo+OR+termcap)&rnum=123&hl=en#66481938acc67375
By the way the following statements are quite incorrect: "MC "could" be built with ncurses, but its maintainers have been not much interested in maintaining that configuration(*)." "(*) equally, since MC for quite a while used gcc-specific code which would not compile with an ANSI C compiler, I was uninterested in wasting much time with it. " I myself am using MC with ncurses most of the tmie. The Cygwin package for MC, which I maintain, is compiled against ncurses. I have spent considerable amount of time tracking bugs in MC to make it work correct with ncurses. I build MC on my Solaris 10 machine on a regular basis with Sun's compiler. I've also built MC on Tru64 with Compaq/HP's compiler. You seem to try to spread misinformation regarding MC on every possible occasion as you did in the Debian bug tracking system. _______________________________________________ Mc mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc