Hello Yury,
On Thu, 5 May 2016 10:35:41 +0200 (CEST) "Yury V. Zaytsev" <y...@shurup.com> wrote: > On Thu, 5 May 2016, wwp wrote: > > > I've added a smbfs link to my hotlist, and now I see a bunch of > > questions/issues: > > Currently, mc's smbfs is currently outdated, insecure and badly broken. At > some point, Slava undertook a rewrite, but it was never finished, and > apparently nobody is really interested, so whether it will ever happen is an > open question, but I wouldn't bet on it. > > I would much rather recommend you setting up SMBNetFS, which will resolve all > the problems you're mentioning, I believe: > > http://askubuntu.com/a/653913 Hah! If I knew it was outdated.. I've set up smbfs mounts through fstab and autofs for my user so it's not a problem. I liked the idea to have it from mc itself, like it does for FTP, and I was tempted by it mostly in order to avoid cifs mount resistance to hibernation and other hang outs (I re-discover smbfs after few years, I see it's still as slow and itchy as it was), but it's not critical at all. I'll have a look at smbnetfs as well, thanks for the tip! Regards, -- wwp
pgpwzb298t2wS.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ mc mailing list https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc
