On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 02:02:06PM -0700, Shesha Sreenivasamurthy SCA wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > I feel the lack of getting addresses and symbols side by side from > mdb as a serious short coming of mdb. Therefore, I propose the following > change and request your opinion on this before I can file an RFE for > integrating to the on10-feature-patch gate. I think this is the right > gate, but let me know if I'm wrong. > > My plan is to do add a new option '-b', which stands for "both" to the > dis command of mdb, so that the addresses can be dis-assembled as follows: > > 10fcf34 do_relocate+0x29c: lduh [%i4 + 0x6], %i0 > 10fcf38 do_relocate+0x2a0: ldx [%i4 + 0x8], %g2 > 10fcf3c do_relocate+0x2a4: ba +0xd4 > <do_relocate+0x378> > 10fcf40 do_relocate+0x2a8: ldx [%fp + 0x7df], %g5 > 10fcf44 do_relocate+0x2ac: cmp %i0, 0x0 > > Corresponding code change is here: http://lightside.sfbay/~ss161897/snon10
Can you resend the right webrev? That doesn't look like mdb changes, it is something different. -Mike -- Mike Shapiro, Sun Microsystems Fishworks. blogs.sun.com/mws/
