Hello All,
    Sorry the link was messed up. Here is the new link: 
http://lightside.sfbay/~ss161897/webrevs/solaris/mdb_dis_b_v1

If there are any audience external to Sun please bear with me until I 
open a RFE for this.

             0
Thanks,     (_-/>
Shesha;     /\ \
          (*)--(*)

  G O   G R E E N



Mike Shapiro wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 02:02:06PM -0700, Shesha Sreenivasamurthy SCA wrote:
>   
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>>    I feel the lack of getting addresses and symbols side by side from 
>> mdb as a serious short coming of mdb. Therefore, I propose the following 
>> change and request your opinion on this before I can file an RFE for 
>> integrating to the on10-feature-patch gate. I think this is the right 
>> gate, but let me know if I'm wrong.
>>
>> My plan is to do add a new option '-b', which stands for "both" to the 
>> dis command of mdb, so that the addresses can be dis-assembled as follows:
>>
>> 10fcf34   do_relocate+0x29c:                    lduh      [%i4 + 0x6], %i0
>> 10fcf38   do_relocate+0x2a0:                    ldx       [%i4 + 0x8], %g2
>> 10fcf3c   do_relocate+0x2a4:                    ba        +0xd4         
>> <do_relocate+0x378>
>> 10fcf40   do_relocate+0x2a8:                    ldx       [%fp + 0x7df], %g5
>> 10fcf44   do_relocate+0x2ac:                    cmp       %i0, 0x0
>>
>> Corresponding code change is here: http://lightside.sfbay/~ss161897/snon10
>>     
>
> Can you resend the right webrev?  That doesn't look like mdb
> changes, it is something different.
>
> -Mike
>
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/mdb-discuss/attachments/20080312/03a33f4c/attachment.html>

Reply via email to