http://musliminsuffer.blogspot.com/

bismi-lLahi-rRahmani-rRahiem
In the Name of God, the Compassionate, the Merciful


=== News Update ===

Selective Prosecution of War Crimes

by Ivan Eland

In Saddam Hussein's war crimes trial for the 1988 Iraqi "Anfal" campaign 
that gassed Kurdish villages, his defense lawyers have argued that Iraqi 
forces were really attempting to strike Iranian forces and the Iraqi 
Kurdish peshmerga militias that were in and supported by the hamlets. In 
other words, the lawyers are asserting that the innocent Kurds who were 
killed were collateral damage in an effort by the Iraqi government to rid 
its territory of Iranian fighters and their Kurdish allies during the 
Iran-Iraq War in the 1980s. Curiously, this defense sounds similar to 
Israel's defense of killing more than one thousand Lebanese and 
perpetrating widespread destruction of Shi'ite neighborhoods, apartment 
houses, water services, electrical power stations, ports, factories, roads, 
and bridges in Lebanon in its efforts to punish Hezbollah. Yet Saddam 
Hussein is on trial for war crimes and Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert 
is still in office.

Of course, rabid supporters of Israel would be horrified at a comparison 
between a democratically elected leader and an autocratic tyrant. But we 
are not talking about the selection method for leaders here; we are 
comparing their specific actions during wartime. Supporters of Israel would 
also note that the Israelis did not use poison gas in Lebanon. But although 
chemical weapons provide a grisly death, they kill far fewer people than 
explosive bombs. Because they have been wrongly included in the 
ominous-sounding category of "weapons of mass destruction" (nuclear weapons 
are probably the only true, practical weapons of mass destruction), their 
use implies a war crime from the get-go. That is not to defend Saddam's use 
of these area weapons against villages, it is merely to say that the 
Israelis are no less guilty of committing war crimes by leveling entire 
villages in southern Lebanon simply because they used conventional bombs to 
do it.

Amnesty International, a human rights group, has accused Israel of military 
strikes that included "directly attacking civilian objects and carrying out 
indiscriminate or disproportionate attacks." Amnesty concluded that "the 
evidence strongly suggests that the extensive destruction of public works, 
power systems, civilian homes, and industry was a deliberate and integral 
part of the military strategy rather than collateral damage." The group 
also accused Israel of deliberately targeting food stores and gasoline 
stations.

Furthermore, the U.S. State Department, because of complaints from human 
rights groups, has launched an investigation into whether Israel violated 
U.S. rules banning the use of U.S.-made cluster bombs – bombs releasing 
bomblets that explode over a wide area to target people – in residential 
areas. The UN Mine Action Coordination Center has confirmed 289 instances 
of cluster bomb usage by Israel, many of them in civilian areas. Although 
the investigation is not yet complete, the circumstantial evidence looks 
damning, and the Israeli track record on this score is not good. According 
to the Washington Post, as a result of a congressional investigation that 
discovered the Israelis had violated agreements on the use of U.S.-made 
cluster weapons during its 1982 invasion of Lebanon, the Reagan 
administration suspended sales of them to Israel for six years.

In fact, the main difference between Saddam's war crimes and Israel's is 
that while Saddam denies them, Israeli officials indirectly admit them. 
Amnesty cites a comment by Israel's top uniformed military official that 
implied that Israel was trying to punish the Lebanese population and 
government to get them to oppose Hezbollah. The group noted that Israeli 
military chief of staff Lt. Gen. Dan Halutz called Hezbollah a "cancer" 
that Lebanon must expunge "because if they don't, their country will pay a 
very high price."

Adding to this intentional targeting of civilians for political reasons 
(when Hezbollah and other non-governmental groups do it, it is called 
"terrorism") in Lebanon, Israel is currently still conducting a military 
and economic siege of Gaza. To punish the people of Gaza for electing the 
wrong party in democratic elections last January, and for Hamas' capture of 
an Israeli soldier, Israel slapped a blockade on the area that prohibits 
almost all goods from being exported and restricts imports, except for 
limited food supplies. Israel bombed an electricity plant in Gaza, making 
supplies of power and water intermittent, since water supplies depend on 
electric pumps. Thus, most factories in Gaza are shut down. Also, the 
Israeli military routinely bulldozes the homes of relatives of people it 
believes to be Hamas fighters. Trying to kill a population slowly – by 
strangling the flow of critical goods and cutting off electricity and water 
to hospitals, orphanages, schools, and factories producing vitally needed 
goods – is little better than attempting to exterminate it quickly with 
explosive bombs.

To justify its ill-advised invasion of Iraq, the Bush administration 
regularly gripes about Saddam Hussein's war crimes, while cheering on 
Israel as it does the same thing in Lebanon and Gaza, just using different 
weapons.

source:
http://www.antiwar.com/eland/?articleid=9618

===


-muslim voice-
______________________________________
BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW  

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Ajaklah teman dan saudara anda bergabung ke milis Media Dakwah.
Kirim email ke: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/media-dakwah/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to