http://musliminsuffer.blogspot.com/

bismi-lLahi-rRahmani-rRahiem
In the Name of God, the Compassionate, the Merciful


=== News Update ===


Reclaiming The Issues: Islamic Or Republican Fascism?

By Thom Hartmann

08/29/06 "<http://informationclearinghouse.info/>Information Clearing 
House" --- - In the years since George W. Bush first used 9/11 as his own 
"Reichstag fire" to gut the Constitution and enhance the power and wealth 
of his corporate cronies, many across the political spectrum have accused 
him and his Republican support group of being fascists.

On the right,<http://www.jbs.org/node/740>The John Birch Society's website 
editor recently opined of the Bush Administration's warrantless wiretap 
program: "This is to say that from the administration's perspective, the 
president is, in effect, our living constitution. This is, in a specific 
and unmistakable sense, fascist."

On the left, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. specifically indicts the Bush 
administration for fascistic behavior in his book 
"<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0060746882/ref=nosim/commondreams-20/>Crimes
 
Against Nature: How George W. Bush and his Corporate Pals Are Plundering 
the Country and Hijacking Our Democracy."

Genuine American fascists are on the run, and part of their survival 
strategy is to redefine the term "fascism" so it can't be applied to them 
any more. Most recently, George W. Bush said: "This nation is at war with 
Islamic fascists who will use any means to destroy those of us who love 
freedom, to hurt our nation."

In fact, the Islamic fundamentalists who apparently perpetrated 9/11 and 
other crimes in Spain and the United Kingdom are advocating a 
fundamentalist theocracy, not fascism.

But theocracy - the merging of religion and government - is also on the 
plate for the new American fascists (just as it was for Hitler, who based 
the Nazi death cult on a "new Christianity" that would bring "a thousand 
years of peace"), so they don't want to use that term, either.

While the Republicans promote the term "Islamo-fascism," the rest of the 
world is pushing back, as the 
<http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4785065.stm>BBC noted in an article by 
Richard Allen Greene ("Bush's Language Angers US Muslims" - 12 August 2006):
"Security expert Daniel Benjamin of the Center for Strategic and 
International Studies agreed that the term [Islamic fascists] was meaningless.
"'There is no sense in which jihadists embrace fascist ideology as it was 
developed by Mussolini or anyone else who was associated with the term,' he 
said. 'This is an epithet, a way of arousing strong emotion and tarnishing 
one's opponent, but it doesn't tell us anything about the content of their 
beliefs.'"

Their beliefs are, quite simply, that governments of the world should be 
subservient to religion, a view shared by a small but significant part of 
today's Republican party<http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/>. But 
that is not fascism - the fascists in the US want to exploit the 
fundamentalist theocrats to achieve their own fascistic goals.

Vice President of the United States Henry Wallace was the first to clearly 
and accurately point out who the real American fascists are, and what 
they're up to.

In early 1944 the New York Times asked Vice President Wallace to, as 
Wallace noted, "write a piece answering the following questions: What is a 
fascist? How many fascists have we? How dangerous are they?"

Vice President Wallace's answers to those questions were published in The 
New York Times on April 9, 1944, at the height of the war against the Axis 
powers of Germany and Japan:
"The really dangerous American fascists," Wallace wrote, "are not those who 
are hooked up directly or indirectly with the Axis. The FBI has its finger 
on those. The dangerous American fascist is the man who wants to do in the 
United States in an American way what Hitler did in Germany in a Prussian 
way. The American fascist would prefer not to use violence. His method is 
to poison the channels of public information. With a fascist the problem is 
never how best to present the truth to the public but how best to use the 
news to deceive the public into giving the fascist and his group more money 
or more power."

In this, Vice President Wallace was using the classic definition of the 
word "fascist" - the definition Mussolini had in mind when he claimed to 
have invented the word. (It was actually Italian philosopher Giovanni 
Gentile who wrote the entry in the Encyclopedia Italiana that said: 
"Fascism should more appropriately be called corporatism because it is a 
merger of state and corporate power." Mussolini, however, affixed his name 
to the entry, and claimed credit for it.)

As the 1983 American Heritage Dictionary noted, fascism is: "A system of 
government that exercises a dictatorship of the extreme right, typically 
through the merging of state and business leadership, together with 
belligerent nationalism." (The US dictionary definition has gotten somewhat 
squishier since then, as all the larger dictionary companies have been 
bought up by multinational corporations.)

Mussolini was quite straightforward about all this. In a 1923 pamphlet 
titled "The Doctrine of Fascism" he wrote, "If classical liberalism spells 
individualism, Fascism spells government." But not a government of, by, and 
for We The People - instead, it would be a government of, by, and for the 
most powerful corporate interests in the nation.

In 1938, Mussolini brought his vision of fascism into full reality when he 
dissolved Parliament and replaced it with the "Camera dei Fasci e delle 
Corporazioni" - the Chamber of the Fascist Corporations. Corporations were 
still privately owned, but now instead of having to sneak their money to 
folks like John Boehner and covertly write legislation, they were openly in 
charge of the government.

Vice President Wallace bluntly laid out his concern about the same 
happening here in America in his 1944 Times article:
" If we define an American fascist as one who in case of conflict puts 
money and power ahead of human beings, then there are undoubtedly several 
million fascists in the United States. There are probably several hundred 
thousand if we narrow the definition to include only those who in their 
search for money and power are ruthless and deceitful. ... They are 
patriotic in time of war because it is to their interest to be so, but in 
time of peace they follow power and the dollar wherever they may lead."

Nonetheless, at that time there were few corporate heads who had run for 
political office, and, in Wallace's view, most politicians still felt it 
was their obligation to represent We The People instead of corporate 
cartels. The real problem would come, he believed, when the media was 
concentrated in only a few hands:


"American fascism will not be really dangerous," he added in the next 
paragraph, "until there is a purposeful coalition among the cartelists, the 
deliberate poisoners of public information..."

Noting that, "Fascism is a worldwide disease," Wallace further suggested 
that fascism's "greatest threat to the United States will come after the 
war" and will manifest "within the United States itself."

In Sinclair Lewis's 1935 novel "It Can't Happen Here," a conservative 
southern politician is helped to the presidency by a nationally syndicated 
"conservative" radio talk show host. The politician - Buzz Windrip - runs 
his campaign on family values, the flag, and patriotism. Windrip and the 
talk show host portray advocates of traditional American democracy as 
anti-American. When Windrip becomes President, he opens a Guantanamo-style 
detention center, and the viewpoint character of the book, Vermont 
newspaper editor Doremus Jessup, flees to Canada to avoid prosecution under 
new "patriotic" laws that make it illegal to criticize the President. As 
Lewis noted in his novel:


"The President, with something of his former good-humor [said]: 'There are 
two [political] parties, the Corporate and those who don't belong to any 
party at all, and so, to use a common phrase, are just out of luck!' The 
idea of the Corporate or Corporative State, Secretary [of State] Sarason 
had more or less taken from Italy." And, President "Windrip's partisans 
called themselves the Corporatists, or, familiarly, the 'Corpos,' which 
nickname was generally used."

Lewis, the first American writer to win a Nobel Prize, was world famous by 
1944, as was his book "It Can't Happen Here." And several well-known and 
powerful Americans, including Prescott Bush, had lost businesses in the 
early 1940s because of charges by Roosevelt that they were doing business 
with Hitler. These events all, no doubt, colored Vice President Wallace's 
thinking when he wrote in The New York Times:
"Still another danger is represented by those who, paying lip service to 
democracy and the common welfare, in their insatiable greed for money and 
the power which money gives, do not hesitate surreptitiously to evade the 
laws designed to safeguard the public from monopolistic extortion. American 
fascists of this stamp were clandestinely aligned with their German 
counterparts before the war, and are even now preparing to resume where 
they left off, after 'the present unpleasantness' ceases."

Thus, the rich get richer (and more powerful) on the backs of the poor and 
the middle class, giant corporate behemoths wipe out small and middle sized 
businesses, and a corporate iron fist is seizing control of our government 
itself. As I detail in my new book 
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1576754146/commondreams-20/ref=nosim/>"<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1576754146/commondreams-20/ref=nosim/>Screwed:
 
The Undeclared War Against The Middle Class," the primary beneficiaries of 
this new fascism are the corporatists, while the once-outspoken middle 
class of the 1950s-1980s is systematically being replaced by a silent 
serf-class of the working poor.
As Wallace wrote, some in big business "are willing to jeopardize the 
structure of American liberty to gain some temporary advantage." He added, 
"Monopolists who fear competition and who distrust democracy because it 
stands for equal opportunity would like to secure their position against 
small and energetic enterprise [companies]. In an effort to eliminate the 
possibility of any rival growing up, some monopolists would sacrifice 
democracy itself."

But American fascists who would want former CEOs as President, Vice 
President, House Majority Whip, and Senate Majority Leader, and write 
legislation with corporate interests in mind, don't generally talk to We 
The People about their real agenda, or the harm it does to small businesses 
and working people. Instead, as Hitler did with the trade union leaders and 
the Jews, they point to a "them" to pin with blame and distract people from 
the harms of their economic policies.

In a comment prescient of George W. Bush's recent suggestion that 
civilization itself is at risk because of gays or Muslims, Wallace continued:
" The symptoms of fascist thinking are colored by environment and adapted 
to immediate circumstances. But always and everywhere they can be 
identified by their appeal to prejudice and by the desire to play upon the 
fears and vanities of different groups in order to gain power. It is no 
coincidence that the growth of modern tyrants has in every case been 
heralded by the growth of prejudice. It may be shocking to some people in 
this country to realize that, without meaning to do so, they hold views in 
common with Hitler when they preach discrimination..."

But even at this, Wallace noted, American fascists would have to lie to the 
people in order to gain power. And, because they were in bed with the 
nation's largest corporations - who could gain control of newspapers and 
broadcast media - they could promote their lies with ease.
"The American fascists are most easily recognized by their deliberate 
perversion of truth and fact," Wallace wrote. "Their newspapers and 
propaganda carefully cultivate every fissure of disunity, every crack in 
the common front against fascism. They use every opportunity to impugn 
democracy."

In his strongest indictment of the tide of fascism the Vice President of 
the United States saw rising in America, he added:
"They claim to be super-patriots, but they would destroy every liberty 
guaranteed by the Constitution. They demand free enterprise, but are the 
spokesmen for monopoly and vested interest. Their final objective toward 
which all their deceit is directed is to capture political power so that, 
using the power of the state and the power of the market simultaneously, 
they may keep the common man in eternal subjection."
Finally, Wallace said, "The myth of fascist efficiency has deluded many 
people. ... Democracy, to crush fascism internally, must...develop the 
ability to keep people fully employed and at the same time balance the 
budget. It must put human beings first and dollars second. It must appeal 
to reason and decency and not to violence and deceit. We must not tolerate 
oppressive government or industrial oligarchy in the form of monopolies and 
cartels."

This liberal vision of an egalitarian America in which very large 
businesses and media monopolies are broken up under the 1890 Sherman 
Anti-Trust Act (which Reagan stopped enforcing, leading to the mergers & 
acquisitions frenzy that continues to this day) was the driving vision of 
the New Deal (and of "Trust Buster" Teddy Roosevelt a generation earlier).

As Wallace's President, Franklin D. Roosevelt, said when he accepted his 
party's renomination in 1936 in Philadelphia:
"...Out of this modern civilization, economic royalists [have] carved new 
dynasties.... It was natural and perhaps human that the privileged princes 
of these new economic dynasties, thirsting for power, reached out for 
control over government itself. They created a new despotism and wrapped it 
in the robes of legal sanction.... And as a result the average man once 
more confronts the problem that faced the Minute Man...."

Speaking indirectly of the fascists that Wallace would directly name almost 
a decade later, Roosevelt brought the issue to its core:
"These economic royalists complain that we seek to overthrow the 
institutions of America. What they really complain of is that we seek to 
take away their power."

But, he thundered in that speech:
"Our allegiance to American institutions requires the overthrow of this 
kind of power!"

In 2006, we again stand at the same crossroad Roosevelt and Wallace 
confronted during the Great Depression and World War II. Fascism is again 
rising in America, this time calling itself "compassionate conservatism," 
and "the free market" in a "flat" world. The RNC's behavior today eerily 
parallels the day in 1936 when Roosevelt said:
"In vain they seek to hide behind the flag and the Constitution. In their 
blindness they forget what the flag and the Constitution stand for."

President Roosevelt and Vice President Wallace's warnings have come full 
circle. Thus it's now critical that we reclaim the word "fascist" to 
describe current-day Republican policies, support 
<http://www.commondreams.org/donate.htm>progressive websites that spread 
the good word, and join together this November at the ballot box to stop 
fascist election fraud and this most recent incarnation of 
Republican-fascism from seizing complete and irretrievable control of our 
nation.

Thom Hartmann is a Project Censored Award-winning best-selling author, and 
host of a nationally syndicated daily progressive talk show carried on the 
<http://www.airamericaradio.com/thomhartmannpage>Air America Radio network 
and 
<http://www.sirius.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=Sirius/CachedPage&c=Channel&cid=1104779630493>Sirius.
 
www.thomhartmann.com

source:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article14747.htm

===


-muslim voice-
______________________________________
BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW  

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Ajaklah teman dan saudara anda bergabung ke milis Media Dakwah.
Kirim email ke: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/media-dakwah/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to