Thanks for the info. I'm still an advocate for static linking, but I think the following suggestion is a great idea: > > * How about keeping the dll/.so version as portmidi and portmidi_s as > the static one? That way most existing programs will not need to be > changed (actually I'm not sure how many programs are using portmidi?), > and the static version can still be selected by name. > I haven't heard from anyone else on the list. If there's no opposition or better ideas before Monday, I'll reconfigure everything to generate portmidi (dynamic) and portmidi_s (static). I think that will at least keep 2 of us happy :-)
-Roger _______________________________________________ media_api mailing list [email protected] http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/media_api
