Hello, Having portmidi dynamic libs is mandatory for people like me who use it from C# via P/Invoke. At least, it is the only possible solution for Mono users (no C++/CLI or managed C++ land).
Atsushi Eno On 2009/10/16 20:55, Roger Dannenberg wrote: > Thanks for the info. I'm still an advocate for static linking, but I > think the following suggestion is a great idea: > >> * How about keeping the dll/.so version as portmidi and portmidi_s as >> the static one? That way most existing programs will not need to be >> changed (actually I'm not sure how many programs are using portmidi?), >> and the static version can still be selected by name. >> >> > I haven't heard from anyone else on the list. If there's no opposition > or better ideas before Monday, I'll reconfigure everything to generate > portmidi (dynamic) and portmidi_s (static). I think that will at least > keep 2 of us happy :-) > > -Roger > > _______________________________________________ > media_api mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/media_api > > _______________________________________________ media_api mailing list [email protected] http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/media_api
