2009/5/7 Chris Reigrut <[email protected]>: > David Garard wrote: >> I'm still looking forward to corporate readiness of MediaWiki, which >> for us basically means (1) good WYSIWYG (2) good search. (2) means >> Lucene in a box. We hardly care what box. >> (The competitor is Confluence. Which is highly usable and an UTTER >> BASTARD to administer. Though Atlassian are very good at support.)
> This actually came from the Key Equipment Finance wiki. We've found it > to be pretty good, but not perfect, in a corporate environment. This > addressed point #2, and we've used FCKEditor with pretty good success > for #1. Many folks would argue there's a #3 (fine-grained security), > but I've managed to hold them off on that front thus far. Yeah. "Fine-grained security" and "wiki" really don't go together. But try convincing people of that. - d. _______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
