On 14/11/13 20:52, Nathan Larson wrote: > On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Tim Starling <tstarl...@wikimedia.org>wrote: > >> On 10/11/13 03:57, Nathan Larson wrote: >>> Also, we have other antispam tools that are way more effective than >>> nofollow at deterring spam. >> >> Like what? AbuseFilter is unusable for small wikis, SpamBlacklist is >> poorly maintained, and FancyCaptcha is comprehensively broken -- we >> have had reports of sites with FancyCaptcha being spammed to death. >> Pretty much any captcha can be broken for $1.39 per 1000. You wouldn't >> need very many impressions per edit for that to be economical. >> > > Asirra works pretty well. I've never seen it fail to bring spam down to > almost nil.
So, is there any open source solution? -- Tim Starling _______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list MediaWiki-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
