> Shaver, > > Link and reference this threats in the new meego forum could be a tedious > work. > What do you think about create a corner inside of the Meego Forum with > all the stuff related with Maemo Forum?, this will means having one > section for Maemo and inside of it > all the current sections in Maemo Forum.
This could be considered, but to me it feels like a duplication of content. > In my opinion, to separate this information it doesn't give > consideration to all the work done in Maemo Forum. I don't necessarily agree with this. From what I understand, the Maemo forums will continue to exist and may have separate threads unrelated to MeeGo. All the content in the Maemo forums will then not be lost at all, but retained for however long the community feels it's relevant. Starting fresh on MeeGo doesn't mean that thoughts and conclusions in Maemo can't be used as the starting point. > Cheers, > > Adrian. > > On 16 March 2010 20:58, Shaver, Michael R <michael.r.sha...@intel.com> wrote: >> >>> We need think also in the compatibility/migration with old Maemo >>> forum?. I mean the forum content ( a very useful information ) is >>> going to be migrated to the MeeGo project or is going to be maintain >>> at Maemo.org as independent? >>> >>> If the information is going to be migrated use another forum different >>> of VBulletin could be a problem ( the migration between this two >>> platforms is a bit complicated) >>> >>> Anyway if MeeGo stars from zero ( it means new forum without the >>> discussions threads from the old Maemo Forum) to use phpBB isn't a >>> problem. Installation & administration hasn't big differences compare >>> with VBulletin. >> >> The MeeGo forum will need to start from zero. There may in fact be many >> relevant threads in talk.maemo.org, but it's best to reinitiate these for >> MeeGo and refer to those threads in talk where needed. >> >>> Finally in my opinion to use an open source solution will be very the >>> correct choice. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Adrian. >>> >>> >>> >>> On 16 March 2010 20:08, Tim Samoff <t...@samoff.com> wrote: >>>> Sure. apologies, then. >>>> >>>> I'm not arguing the practice of pondering software licenses. I'm arguing >>>> the >>>> time wasted talking about something that has little relevance to the >>>> end-product (and, since it's all imho, no one needs to fret). >>>> >>>> Tim >>>> >>>> >>>> quim....@nokia.com wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> unpopular to some OS nazis). ;) >>>>> >>>>> Er... There is times when a smiley doesn't make a comment less distateful. >>>>> >>>>> The Linux Foundation that drives MeeGo is an exsplicit open source >>>>> project. The Open Source Lab of the Oregon State University that will host >>>>> the MeeGo infrastructure tells everything by its name. MeeGo itself is an >>>>> open source project. >>>>> >>>>> Therefore it is totally relevant to ponder the role of the software >>>>> license in our context. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Quim Gil >>>> >>>> -- >>>> http://samoff.com >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Meego-community mailing list >>>> Meego-community@meego.com >>>> http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-community >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Meego-community mailing list >>> Meego-community@meego.com >>> http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-community >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Meego-community mailing list >> Meego-community@meego.com >> http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-community >> > _______________________________________________ Meego-community mailing list Meego-community@meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-community
