Hi An,

On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 11:45 AM, An Yang <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Hi Zhang,
>
> Take it easy, everybody here love opensource.
> Thanks Intel for keeping these change logs kindly.
>
> Let the Fedora guys do the package and testing jobs is a very good idea,
> meego guys could focus on the key packages, just like ubuntu is based on
> debian.
>
Actually MeeGo project will be building their own packages and test
them. In future it might be possible to use SRPMS and/or Specs from
Fedora project. But MeeGo itself is a new separate distro and will be
building their own packages. So the analogy of Ubuntu/Debian is not
quite accurate here.

Being said that, it's would probably be much easy to have interop with
Fedora given the current architectures of the both projects. Is the past
Fedora project used to ship Moblin packages which enabled Fedora
users to use the Moblin experience on top of Fedora.

It's too early to speculate, but hopefully we'll see how things shape in
the near future.


>
>
>
> 在 2010-04-02五的 13:50 +0800,Zhang, Austin写道:
>
> Red Hat people are also open source community people, right?:)
>
> Any good fixing/ideas/improvement from anyone (if they’d like to contribute
> to open source) can be added into Meego.
>
> And if people DOES have good working/contribution on any components, why
> don’t keep those kind of log?
>
> Maybe next time when you check some log, you will find your name/your
> company name thereJ
>
>
>
>
>
>  *From:* An Yang [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Friday, April 02, 2010 1:44 PM
> *To:* Zhang, Austin
> *Cc:* Samir Faci (Dev); [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [MeeGo-dev] Building the Meego Dev Environment
>
>
>
>
> for example:
> rpm -q --changelog glibc
> or what ever rpm name, you could find many redhat guys.
>
>  2010/4/2 Zhang, Austin <[email protected]>
>
>  >…most of them come from Fedora 13,
>
> Not sure how do you get this conclusion? Meego is not derived from any
> else.
>
>
>
> >so I think fedora 13 is the prefer DEV ENV.
>
>
>  Several (not only one specific distro) can be used as development
> environment.
>
>
>
>  *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> *On Behalf Of *An Yang
> *Sent:* Friday, April 02, 2010 11:56 AM
> *To:* Samir Faci (Dev)
> *Cc:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [MeeGo-dev] Building the Meego Dev Environment
>
>
>
>
> There are 287 rpm packages in day one release, most of them come from
> Fedora 13, so I think fedora 13 is the prefer DEV ENV.
>
> 在 2010-04-01四的 11:22 -0600,Samir Faci (Dev)写道:
>
>
> I'm trying to follow this guide:
>  http://wiki.meego.com/Developing_in_a_Meego_Environment
>
> Some of the packages seems to be missing in Ubuntu.  The pykickstart
> in particular.  I'm sure I can check it out and do it manually, but
> just an overall question.
>
> Is it recommended to use FC to build Meego?  I'm just curious if meego
> is mainly being developed in FC, Centos or something along those
> lines.  I can match up the nokia dev environment if it just avoid
> potential issues.
>
> Also something of note:
>  http://wiki.meego.com/Image_Creation#Requirements   (If you install
> image_creation once it's installed it installs a binary named
> mic-image-creator not
> mic2-image-creator )
>
>
> I installed both the binary version and the git checkout and I believe
> the docs might be a bit out of date.
>
> --
> Samir Faci
> *insert title*
> fortune | cowsay -f /usr/share/cows/tux.cow
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MeeGo-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
>
>
-- 
Gaveen Prabhasara
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev

Reply via email to