On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 10:40 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > My question initially was if there was a preferred platform for Meego. > > Just like the statement above, it seemed like trying to build Meego's > > dev or final-2.1 environment on Fedora was a lot less problematic then > > the Ubuntu version. I've had a much easier time building Meego on FC. > > If Nokia's developers generally prefer working on FC, then odds are > > things will be first documented and more likely to work in the > > environment they primarily work in. I'm sure it'll work on every > > flavor of Linux with a bit of work... I'd just rather spend the time > > on actual code for meego rather then making meego work. > > > > That being said... fedora, ubuntu, SuSe... as long as we have a > > product it doesn't matter what it is based on, used, as long as it > > works. > > > to answer your question (and I think Auke already did it as well), > I and several of my coworkers run MeeGo to develop MeeGo. > It's the one environment that we can make sure works, and also that > many of us now run ;-)
Ok then, where do I get a MeeGo image to install on a spare development desktop, or on a VM? Bernd -- No amount of shouting at the round earth will make it flat. _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
