On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 12:26:18PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On 5/12/2010 12:22, Greg KH wrote: > >On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 01:09:16PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: > >>On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 02:00:46PM +0300, Ameya Palande wrote: > >>>Btrfs is highly experimental, and THE DISK FORMAT IS NOT YET > >>>FINALIZED. You should say N here unless you are interested in > >>>testing Btrfs with non-critical data. > >>> > >> > >>I would tend to agree, btrfs looks great, but it's just not ready yet. > > > >ready for what? Looks to be ready for MeeGo :) > > yup it is... > > blanket "it's not just ready" not based on actual arguments are a bit useless > to me. > we've been using BTRFS in all builds for a long time now, and frankly we have > had more > issues with the ext3 side of the world than with btrfs ;)
I totally agree, it's working great for our testing as well. Neil, what is the specific problems you are having with btrfs on "real" sized storage devices (not for 1-2Gb devices, that's a different issue.) thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list MeeGo-dev@meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
