Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 3:04 AM, Lee Fisher <blib...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> To be very blunt... Firefox isn't nearly as good a browser as Chrome or >>> Chromium..... >> >> That is the first time I've heard that. From everywhere I've read and talked >> to and experienced, Chrome is less secure and less powerful. > > What are you talking about? Chrome beats Firefox in almost every > possible way,
It seems that the page loading benchmarks are based on 'onload' firing time, which doesn't capture user's perception and isn't neutral (webkit fires it before the layout phase, while Gecko fires it after layout: http://trac.webkit.org/browser/trunk/WebCore/dom/Document.cpp#L2128 http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/bz/archives/020434.html ) And with javascript benchmarks their numbers are very close: http://arewefastyet.com/ > why do you think it's gaining market share at gigantic pace while > Firefox is decreasing? > > 1) Windows browsers benchmarked: October 2010 edition > Chrome: it's fast! > http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2010/10/windows-browsers-benchmarked-october-2010-edition.ars > > 2) Web Browser Grand Prix: The Top Five, Tested And Ranked > Any way you want to analyze the data, Google's Chrome comes out on top. > http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/firefox-chrome-opera,2558.html > > 3) Chrome only browser left standing after day one of Pwn2Own > Google's Chrome browser, however, was the only one left standing—a > victory that security researchers attribute to its innovative sandbox > feature. > http://arstechnica.com/security/news/2009/03/chrome-is-the-only-browser-left-standing-in-pwn2own-contest.ars -- Roger WANG Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list MeeGo-dev@meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
