On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 2:26 AM, Roger WANG <roger.w...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 3:04 AM, Lee Fisher <blib...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> To be very blunt... Firefox isn't nearly as good a browser as Chrome or >>>> Chromium..... >>> >>> That is the first time I've heard that. From everywhere I've read and talked >>> to and experienced, Chrome is less secure and less powerful. >> >> What are you talking about? Chrome beats Firefox in almost every >> possible way, > > It seems that the page loading benchmarks are based on 'onload' firing > time, which doesn't capture user's perception and isn't neutral (webkit > fires it before the layout phase, while Gecko fires it after layout: > > http://trac.webkit.org/browser/trunk/WebCore/dom/Document.cpp#L2128 > http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/bz/archives/020434.html > )
Well, that's how everyone is running tests. > And with javascript benchmarks their numbers are very close: > > http://arewefastyet.com/ That's Firefox 4, which is not out yet (beta). Get some results for Firefox 3.6 (stable) and you'll most likely see a _huge_ difference. -- Felipe Contreras _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list MeeGo-dev@meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
