On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Arjan van de Ven <ar...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > hmmmm wonder why you don't run the tablet/etc UX entirely????
The tablet-UX probably makes good sense on a compatible tablet, with larger surface, better edge-of-screen & button ergonomics, more memory, higher resolution, faster processors, etc. e.g., something like http://www.amazon.com/dp/B004HKIIFI/ (ASUS EEE Slate 12.1" tablet PC). A platform like that would be good incentive to use the tablet UX. (Now accepting all donations :-) ). A better reason is the latest 1.2 Netbook UX worksforme, whereas the Tablet-UX still has some issues that need to be worked out, e.g., http://lists.meego.com/pipermail/meego-dev/2011-April/482477.html where Costas Stylianou wrote: .......................... You are correct, the problem is once you boot to the MeeGo Tablet UX image you lose touch clicks, I believe that the touch driver has been tuned for the ExoPC only which probably has a different touch controller to your device. If you switch to the netbook build touch works very well. [...] ........................... My goal with the camera app is a codebase with portability to all MeeGo platforms (doesn't IVI need a touch-based QML camera app too?). Given the reprioritization of the handset, I still hope to work on some variant of http://code.google.com/p/ytd-meego/wiki/CitizenJournalismWithYoutubeDirectForMeego but want it to run on all platforms that its Qt-based infrastructure would target, not just the handset. Plus, it's a lot easier to develop on the netbook, snarfling up whatever tools and devel libs using http://wiki.meego.com/MeeGo-Lem , with the promise that eventually I'll be able to run the same code on multiple MeeGo targets. and more than just ia32 processors. I'm seeking to evaluate meego-app-camera versus http://code.google.com/p/ytd-meego/wiki/CitizenJournalismWithYoutubeDirectForMeego#Reusing_QtMobility_1.2%27s_%22declarative_camera%22_Exa ... the first step of which is getting meego-app-camera running on a generic MeeGo platform such as the Lenovo s10-3t. The second would be getting it running on the n900 when all the codecs and camera functionality support video recording. If that includes taking all the pieces apart and putting them back together again to understand the dependencies, then so be it... -- Niels http://nielsmayer.com _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list MeeGo-dev@meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev http://wiki.meego.com/Mailing_list_guidelines
