On 11/8/2010 12:44 PM, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On 11/4/2010 3:30 PM, Busson, SebastienX wrote:
From 43e7af5b34d73b269f23542b4dc9f54319719a12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonathan DE CESCO<[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 19:29:30 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] new ldisc for TI WiLink-ST
---
include/linux/tty.h | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/tty.h b/include/linux/tty.h
index 587fe31..0cd4664 100644
--- a/include/linux/tty.h
+++ b/include/linux/tty.h
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
#define N_CAIF 20 /* CAIF protocol for talking to
modems */
#define N_GSM0710 21 /* GSM 0710 Mux */
#define N_PTIR 22 /* PTI cJTAG data routing for MIPI
P1149.7 */
-
+#define N_TI_WL 23 /* for TI's WL BT, FM, GPS combo chips */
this patch is a huge problem.
Upstream has assigned the number 22 to this ABI, not the number 23.
I'm not going to accept a patch with 23 here....
oh and also 23 is used by the same PTI code in another patch
if only the people who write code in this area would get their code
upstream so that there wouldn't be ABI clashes
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-kernel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-kernel
