On 11/13/2018 3:58 AM, Chee Fai wrote:
I found that, with eps averaging on, harminv would still work when the
resolution is at 42. However, harminv would fail when the resolution
is increased to 44 (originally 40). Also, the mode field output is
completely off.
For your reference, we recently added a new FAQ on finding resonant
modes using Harminv:
https://meep.readthedocs.io/en/latest/FAQ/#harminv-is-unable-to-find-the-resonant-modes-of-my-structure
I would appreciate it if you could consider the following feature
requests:
1) Independent resolution for different axes:
Providing support for non-uniform resolutions would be a major
undertaking and one is which not part of our near-term plans. It is
possible using transformation optics to vary the spatial resolution
without any changes to the underlying code. This is described in the
notes linked to in this FAQ:
https://meep.readthedocs.io/en/latest/FAQ/#does-meep-support-a-non-uniform-grid
2) Cylinder with major and minor axes / an elliptical cylinder
There is already an Ellipsoid object with these properties which is
described in the documentation:
https://meep.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Python_User_Interface/#geometricobject.
_______________________________________________
meep-discuss mailing list
meep-discuss@ab-initio.mit.edu
http://ab-initio.mit.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meep-discuss
