Dear Ardavan,
Thank you very much for your reply.
I should have looked at the documentations more close. It didn't occur to me
immediately how the ellipsoid could work before posting.
Thank you very much once again.
Best,
Chee
________________________________
From: meep-discuss <meep-discuss-boun...@ab-initio.mit.edu> on behalf of
Ardavan Oskooi <ardavan.osk...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 1:46 AM
To: meep-discuss@ab-initio.mit.edu
Subject: Re: [Meep-discuss] EPS averaging affecting harminv mode search and
mode distribution
On 11/13/2018 3:58 AM, Chee Fai wrote:
I found that, with eps averaging on, harminv would still work when the
resolution is at 42. However, harminv would fail when the resolution is
increased to 44 (originally 40). Also, the mode field output is completely off.
For your reference, we recently added a new FAQ on finding resonant modes using
Harminv:
https://meep.readthedocs.io/en/latest/FAQ/#harminv-is-unable-to-find-the-resonant-modes-of-my-structure
I would appreciate it if you could consider the following feature requests:
1) Independent resolution for different axes:
Providing support for non-uniform resolutions would be a major undertaking and
one is which not part of our near-term plans. It is possible using
transformation optics to vary the spatial resolution without any changes to the
underlying code. This is described in the notes linked to in this FAQ:
https://meep.readthedocs.io/en/latest/FAQ/#does-meep-support-a-non-uniform-grid
2) Cylinder with major and minor axes / an elliptical cylinder
There is already an Ellipsoid object with these properties which is described
in the documentation:
https://meep.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Python_User_Interface/#geometricobject.
_______________________________________________
meep-discuss mailing list
meep-discuss@ab-initio.mit.edu
http://ab-initio.mit.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meep-discuss
