On Mar 25, 10:07 am, Les Mikesell <lesmikes...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If you put this in the server, don't you set up conditions for: > > A) all clients trigger the wait and thus deadlock > and/or > B) some number of clients run the server out of resources Well, if it's just a lock server, then it'd need to have enough resources to maintain all of the locks that need to be active. There are several lock servers out there (including a recipe for using beanstalkd as a lock server since it's closer to having the necessary facilities than memcached). It'd take a lot of twisting to get memcached to act like a good lock server. It'd take a lot to get memcached to act like a good queue server as well. It's a pretty good cache, though. I say we just use it for that. :)