<<memcache connection pool of 100 connections that round robin as requests to memcached are made
Hi Patrick, what do you mean by this? Do you have 100 instances of Spy MemCachedClient to which you round robin requests? Boris On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Patrick Santora <patwe...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sure Adam, > I have 8 production servers that each have a memcache connection pool of 100 > connections that round robin as requests to memcached are made. I did not > want to have to worry about creating my connection objects on the fly. > In regards to spymemcached, yeah, I just started using it. Before I was > using the general client that came with memcached, but saw that the spy > version had some additional features. > I would be quite interested in getting your feedback in regards to using the > spymemcached client more efficiently. :) > -Pat > > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Adam Lee <a...@fotolog.biz> wrote: >> >> I'm a little late to the party, but I've been reading the emails and >> following along... >> Out of curiosity, what do you mean by this: >>> >>> I have multiple servers on the front end that each have 100 connections >>> round robining to memcached. >> >> I mean, I think I understand what you mean by this, but it doesn't really >> make sense to me-- why does each server need 100 connections to memcached? >> Beyond that, how does each server have 100 connections to memcached? You >> said that you're using the spymemcached client, right? >> If you could explain exactly how your setup works and what your actual >> intention was with this design, I think it'd help me a lot. I have quite a >> bit of experience tuning spymemcached to do hundreds of thousands of >> requests a second, so I'm hoping I can help you out quite a bit once I can >> wrap my head around it. >> On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Patrick Santora <patwe...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> I am having issues with Memcached at the moment. I have multiple >>> servers on the front end that each have 100 connections round robining >>> to memcached. I have 2 memcached servers, each with 512MB of ram and >>> 20 threads (might be a little high) available to each. >>> >>> What I am seeing is that when my memcached container hits around 10MB >>> of written traffic is starts to bottleneck causing my front end >>> systems to slow WAY down. I've turned on verbose debugging and see no >>> issues and there are no complaints on the front end stating that the >>> connection clients are not able to hit memcached. >>> >>> Has anyone seen anything like this before? >>> >>> I would appreciate any feedback that could help out with this. >>> >>> Thanks >>> -Pat >> >> >> >> -- >> awl > >
