Out of the box the default settings for the library may not be what you want.
What is the size of the workload you are sending? Sent from my TI85 On Dec 13, 2011, at 13:10, dormando <dorma...@rydia.net> wrote: >> I'm running: Linux AS292 2.6.38-13-generic #52-Ubuntu SMP Tue Nov 8 >> 16:53:51 UTC 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Ubuntu 11.04 >> >> My CPU is Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2410M CPU @ 2.30GHz with 2 cores. >> Pretty high end laptop. >> >> I've compiled and installed memcached 1.4.10. I've also compiled and >> installed libmemcached-1.0.2. I've started memchached without any >> additional options. >> >> I'm running a simple c++ program to benchmark memcached sets per >> second. I can only get ~22k sets per second which I think is quite >> low? I would be expecting at least 50k and even 300k with latest >> memcached optimizations? >> >> However maybe I'm completely off with my expectations. Here's the >> program that I'm running. Is there anything that I'm doing wrong? >> >> Thanks! > > Run two or three more of your applications, or adjust it to run many > connections in parallel, or to use binary protocol and stack SET's. > > memcached will go much faster, but a single process with a single > connection will be limited by the roundtrip latency. > > Using mc-crusher and multigets or multisets over localhost I can hit > millions: https://github.com/dormando/mc-crusher - but it's not a full > featured client. If I wanted a real client to go that fast, I would > have > to run many more of them as they'd use a bit more CPU.
