On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Dustin <dsalli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> One thing that might not be obvious is that you don't have to use an item > structure to store your data. You just need it to transport it between the > back and front. First, I need to pass a thank-you note for all the helps received, as well as the engine-pu branch itself - it is exactly what we were looking for. Two more questions :) ... 1. any plan to move (merge) the engine-pu back to main line (memcached) source ? 2. a newbie question .. using the default engine as a reference, within "do_store_item()", I don't seem to be able to find the exact logic where the data gets filled into "item" ? Intuitively, I could imagine the item data pointer may have been passed to network layer as part of the network received buffer (?). So the data could have been filled into the right place before "do_store_item()" actually invoked ? Could someone give a short description of how this piece of logic actually works (i.e. how "item_store" is implemented) ? Great thanks, Wendy
