Hi Dormando: I tried version 1.4.15, and the problem replicated, then noticed the spring annotation @CacheEvict and @Transactional, I think the problem may caused by the two annotation's finish time.
We annotate CacheEvict and Transactional on the same method, called method A, which was invoked by another method annotated with Transactional, called method B, because of transaction propagatation, the data in the database was deleted after the method B finished, but the cache was evicted when method A finished, that is the problem: if some method invoke the method that put the data in cache when A finished but B is not finished, the data is in cache again, that result in the cache is not synced with database. I have posted this in the springsource forum to ask for help, I will let you know as soon as I got replied. Thank you for your reply. 在 2013年1月5日星期六UTC+8下午1时03分36秒，Dormando写道： > > This sounds like a client issue. > > Can you try a different client with a test script, as well? > > On Fri, 4 Jan 2013, 马庆升 wrote: > > > Thanks for your reply. I will give it a try. I replicate the problem > this morning, with 2 distributed memcached server ,version 1.4.4, installed > from yum repo. > > Memcached client is spymemcached, version 2.8.4, configured with url = > 192.168.1.128:11211 192.168.1.129:11211, to simulate the network issue, > or server down, memcached serever on 192.168.1.129 was stoped. My > application first put the data in cache, and then delete > > it. I received the DELETED response, but the data still exists. I > installed the twiemcached and do the same thing again, also, the problem > replicated, but not as frequently as official memcached server. > > This afternoon I will try version 1.4.15, and report the result later. > > > > 在 2013年1月4日星期五UTC+8下午3时06分54秒，Dormando写道： > > On Thu, 3 Jan 2013, 马庆升 wrote: > > > > > Server : 10 distributed memcached server, version 1.4.13, > installed on 10 linux server with centos 6.3, no replication.Client : > spymemcached 2.8.4 > > > > > > Problem: > > > I need to delete a cached data, with spymemcached client, I > sent out the delete request, and also received the DELETED response, but > when I checked the data on the server which cached it, it still exists, > just like no delete command was received. I > > am confused > > > with this. The problem occured sometimes, not everytime. > > > > > > Can anyone help me about this? > > > > > > > Can you replicate the problem with 1.4.15? I think there were was > a race > > or two fixed in the middle there. > > > > > >
