Evictions were added in 1.2.2...

________________________________

De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Harry McIntyre
Envoyé : vendredi 1 juin 2007 11:58
À : Ben Hartshorne; Harry McIntyre; [email protected]
Objet : Re: Running as a daemon/monitoring TTL


Do you know which version the eviction stats were added? We are running 1.1.12 
(which came on the Ubuntu server CD I think)
cheers
Harry

 
On 5/31/07, Ben Hartshorne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 

        On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:37:07AM +0100, Harry McIntyre wrote:
        > Hi there folks!
        >
        > We have just set up our first memcached server. As a test I created 
two 
        > instances using -d, one for each of our servers ethernet cards.
        > Unfortunately we used the default size of 64MB. I would like to 
somehow
        > uninstall these daemon processes and reinstall them using 8GB 
instances, but 
        > every time I do a killall and reinstanciate them at a different size, 
then
        > do a reboot, the original size of 64 MB is restored. We are running an
        > Ubuntu 7.04 server.
        
        edit /etc/sysconfig/memcached (or wherever 'grep SYSCONFIG 
        /etc/init.d/memcached' tells you to find your configuration file; dunno
        if it's different on ubuntu - I use CentOS) to specify CACHESIZE="8000"
        for 8GB.  (or should it be 8196?)
        
        > Also,  is there a good way to monitor what the current average insert 
time 
        > of the files being dropped by the LRU algorithm is? I'm not quite 
sure how
        > to tell how hard a memcached server is being hit.
        
        you have stats for number of sets, gets, cache_hits, and evictions,
        which probably are what you're looking for.
        
        -ben
        
        --
        Ben Hartshorne
        email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        http://ben.hartshorne.net 
        
        -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
        Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
        
        iD8DBQFGXwjDKeT3tvTdv64RAprtAJ0TkztEC0MuIN0ChZFsSFxuBaiBSgCfajgL
        nn6dbpkKh4b91zpwXjAMg9k=
        =8uYH
        -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
        
        


Reply via email to