On Apr 3, 2008, at 11:51, dormando wrote:
Some basics, like the remaining bytes disagree with the draft. Obviously it's less work to just update the draft, but are we missing features/intentions? I haven't had time to look, hoping Dustin knows :)
I'f flagged the patches and comments as things to look at, but I haven't actually done so yet. I'm hoping for ``soon.''
At what point (past or future) do we want to consider the protocol in the server ``done?'' That is, if something is inconsistent and ugly in a non-major way (e.g. I'd really like to not do a major rewrite of the headers *again*), it's probably good to get it fixed before everyone switches over (which I'm sure is next week, so we should act fast).
-- Dustin Sallings
