> On Aug 30, 6:28 pm, ornamentalmind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ".
.. it would be, in my opinion, easy to define "too set" to think
straight..." - Michael

Michael, how *would* you define it? I find it quite difficult.

On Aug 30, 6:57 pm, Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Although I understand and agree
> with your fantasy, it remains a fantasy.


That's the upside of the whole thing; for the moment and probably
forever it will remain a fantasy. Therefore, I do not have to worry
about the details or the consquences if such a policy was instituted.
Even so, I am planning to take the time to explain how I would define
and determine "too set" to think straight. But I will do it later.

On Aug 30, 6:57 pm, Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And granting political power to the
> scientific community is the first step to corrupting it.

Unfortunately this is a problem too. However we get around that by
designing a test to eliminate those scientists. who would be
corrupted, from participating. THe only problem is deciding who will
design this test. Maybe we can make a test for that too.


On Aug 30, 6:57 pm, Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> <<However a test could be set up to find out if a person was too set
> or to easily influenced. >>
>
> Although I'm sure this could be done, you've just granted enormous
> political power to the test makers.  Although I understand and agree
> with your fantasy, it remains a fantasy.  In reality, those who are
> able to achieve political power are the least likely to want to
> implement such a policy.  And granting political power to the
> scientific community is the first step to corrupting it.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Memphis Freethought Alliance" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to