For the most part, yes. Most people who've earned a Ph.D. from a credible university such as Stanford should be credible. However, the ultimate authority is reality (as in the natural universe). This person with a Ph.D. should be a trained professional reporter on this natural universe (and its history) such as the history of religion, statements of various theologists, and context of various religious writings (which can be checked). If he or she does not or cannot verify or explain this information, he or she will quickly lose credibility.
On Sep 16, 6:37 pm, Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <<Those who rely upon opinions seldom care about such things. "Ph.D., > Stanford University, Department of Religious Studies, 1995">> > > Yes, your friend has a Ph.D. in woo. This is supposed to increase his > credibility? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Memphis Freethought Alliance" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
