<<Most people who've earned a Ph.D. from a credible university such as Stanford should be credible.>>
At best, only credible on the subjects he's trained in. Not, in this case, "consciousness" and quantum mechanics. Even with respect to his own area of training, I'm sure that it's *possible* to approach theology from a naturalistic perspective, but I'm skeptical that the majority of those attracted to the field have this inclination. Naturalism and theology are oil and water. The article in question is a real mess, the author casually conflating biological evolution and the evolution of the universe, as well as other conceptual problems. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Memphis Freethought Alliance" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
