I don't see anything here about Oregon, but that's OK. 'We' have had the laws on the books for years now and have survived numerous attacks by the Rove thugs in Washington. The law is simple, works well and very few take advantage of it. Overall, as far as I know, it could be used as a good example for any who wish to implement such a code. Most doctors, nurses, voters etc. like it.
If anyone wants to know more, there is much on the web about it. Here, for the vast majority of Oregon citizens, it is a non-issue...it's just one more of the expected freedoms one would find in a true democracy. As an aside, the same is true here for medical marijuana, the US Atty. General attacked our laws numerous times, out of state funds supported election ballot initiatives, etc. While not as strong a law as some, at least it exists. On Oct 2, 8:39 am, Clogtowner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi y'all - just in case:http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/oct/02/law.health1 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Memphis Freethought Alliance" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
