Perhaps someone would like to expand upon the notion of "their obligations to others"? What is meant is not clear. Also, the basis for such an ethos is not clear either.
On Oct 3, 6:29 am, Aaron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Hope they consider their obligations to others.." I agree with this > and it's one of the things I hoped would come up. In a moral (and > sometimes legal) sense, our lives are not totally our own. > > On Oct 2, 5:01 pm, Clogtowner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi y'all - all humans have the right to choose to die. Hope they > > consider their obligations to others first though, whenever relevant. > > Clog aka Clarence > > > On Oct 2, 4:49 pm, Aaron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > What about perfectly healthy people who want to end their lives? > > > Should suicide of any kind be illegal? > > > > Aaron > > > > On Oct 2, 10:39 am, Clogtowner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi y'all - just in > > > > case:http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/oct/02/law.health1-Hidequoted > > > > text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Memphis Freethought Alliance" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
