"...I do think that some of the benefits that married couples get should be reserved for those who are raising children. That goes for both straight and gay couples." - Michael
Which ones Michael? And, perhaps your reasons too? On Oct 12, 12:36 pm, Isparklaria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Steve, > > While I don't think that marriage is based in biology, I do think that > some of the benefits that married couples get should be reserved for > those who are raising children. That goes for both straight and gay > couples. As far as gays adopting, I don't I haven't done the reseach. > Something tells me though that this is a less than ideal situation for > the children. Even so a happy, stable gay couple probably make better > parents than many other straight couples. As for a reserving the term > marriage for straight couples, I am only for it in order to quell the > storm of another harmful wedge issue. > > On Oct 12, 10:19 am, Clogtowner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/12/nyregion/12marriage.html?em- Hide quoted > >text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Memphis Freethought Alliance" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
