Thanks Taylor. Yes, that is a common ploy. Seldom do I fully understand another's motivations.
In the current context, if I remember Charles correctly, I doubt if a discussion w/him would have much function. Here, I assume you have some sort of coherent response to what you imagine he was imputing. On Oct 16, 12:32 pm, Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <<I’m perplexed by your words “And even there it’s not used in a moral > sense…”. >> > > My reading of Jason's reading of Charles was that he was imputing that > atheists have no morals, since they acknowledge no lawgiver. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Memphis Freethought Alliance" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
