Hi y'all: "I doubt if a discussion w/him would have much function."
Oh yes it does. He keeps us informed of the latest twists in irrational thinking and keeps our vocabularies up to date into the bargain. On Oct 16, 3:07 pm, ornamentalmind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks Taylor. Yes, that is a common ploy. > > Seldom do I fully understand another's motivations. > > In the current context, if I remember Charles correctly, I doubt if a > discussion w/him would have much function. Here, I assume you have > some sort of coherent response to what you imagine he was imputing. > > On Oct 16, 12:32 pm, Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > <<I’m perplexed by your words “And even there it’s not used in a moral > > sense…”. >> > > > My reading of Jason's reading of Charles was that he was imputing that > > atheists have no morals, since they acknowledge no lawgiver.- Hide quoted > > text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Memphis Freethought Alliance" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
