No offense taken stem. By the way, since you do have definition #1, what is your concept of god? You say 'traditional monotheistic god'...perhaps you imply christian?...or, jewish?....zoroastrian?... Of course, you don't have to go through this exercise if you don't wish to. I find there are about as many different views of the christian god as there people who have heard of it.
On Oct 30, 4:52 pm, stem cell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Orn., > I did not intend to insult your intelligence on that issue with my > "research"... :-) > > Orn said >>> the > concept of god, which you appear to say you do not have...<<< > > Not to insult, but the definition of "concept" below is there to help > me with clarity. I can and am able to imagine the traditional > monotheistic god, for instance. So, in that sense, I do have a > "concept". [#1 below] The "concept" [#2 below] I do not have, the > "concept" of god that affects my perception and behavior. So, yes, > you are correct. I do not hold that "concept". > > con·cept [ kón sèpt ] (plural con·cepts) > noun > > Definition: > > 1. something thought or imagined: something that somebody has thought > up, or that somebody might be able to imagine > > 2. broad principle affecting perception and behavior: a broad abstract > idea or a guiding general principle, e.g. one that determines how a > person or culture behaves, or how nature, reality, or events are > perceived > > 3. understanding or grasp: the most basic understanding of something > > 4. way of doing or perceiving something: a method, plan, or type of > product or design > > On Oct 30, 5:46 pm, ornamentalmind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Stem thanks for the research, but it was unnecessary. I well know the > > differing ideas of what atheism means/is. I also had thought that it > > would be obvious that when I said ‘deny god’ that I meant god belief(s) > > … evidently not. > > > And, I won’t muddy the waters in this post with a discussion about the > > concept of god, which you appear to say you do not have (“…the > > "concept" of god exist[s], in the theist brain…”), even though you do > > know the word ‘god’. > > > You also asked my definition. I do my best to keep it simple, no > > belief(s) in god(s). > > > This is the case even though one can discuss/debate whether there must > > be a concept attached to a word or not. > > > On Oct 30, 2:47 pm, stem cell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Orn. said >>> And, just as easily anyone could reply: > > > > No. Only theists are free thinkers because clearly, atheists deny god > > > ( like this stem cell person) without any true understanding, thus > > > they are not free thinkers. :-) <<< > > > > My atheism is not a denial of god. How can one deny that which does > > > not exist? It is akin to stating "the time before the big bang when > > > time and space came into existence". One is stating that it is the > > > case that there was a time (which did not exist) before time came into > > > existence. Now, granted, the "concept" of god exist, in the theist > > > brain. (I would say mind but the mind is what the brain does). I > > > acknowledge the existence of that concept. How do you define your > > > atheism? > > > > What Is the Definition of Atheism? > > > Dictionaries, Atheists, Freethinkers, and Others on Defining Atheism > > > By Austin Cline, About.com > > > > "There is, unfortunately, some disagreement about the definition of > > > atheism. It is interesting to note that most of that disagreement > > > comes from theists — atheists themselves tend to agree on what atheism > > > means. Christians in particular dispute the definition used by > > > atheists and insist that atheism means something very different. > > > > The broader, and more common, understanding of atheism among atheists > > > is quite simply "not believing in any gods." No claims or denials are > > > made — an atheist is just a person who does not happen to be a theist. > > > Sometimes this broader understanding is called "weak" or "implicit" > > > atheism. Most good, complete dictionaries readily support this." > > > > For more go to this site link below. > > > >http://atheism.about.com/od/definitionofatheism/a/definition.htm > > > > stemcell > > > > On Oct 30, 4:13 pm, ornamentalmind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > "No. A person can be a freethinker. A theist cannot because they > > > > believe god exist. Once once takes the title of theist then on has > > > > crossed the endzone line in my football metaphore. Freethinking > > > > ends...on that issue." - stem > > > > > Absolutely stem!.....as you now apprehend reality now and even with > > > > metaphors aside. > > > > > And, just as easily anyone could reply: > > > > > No. Only theists are free thinkers because clearly, atheists deny god > > > > ( like this stem cell person) without any true understanding, thus > > > > they are not free thinkers. :-) > > > > > Of course, not being a theist, this is a hypothetical....and the issue > > > > turns into a “ ‘tis, tisn’t, tis, tisn’t, tis, tisn’t…..etc.” issue as > > > > we all know. Such is the result of relative mindstuff and dialectics. > > > > > On Oct 30, 12:47 pm, stem cell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Orn. said >>> All theists are free thinkers, end of discussion! <<< > > > > > > No. A person can be a freethinker. A theist cannot because they > > > > > believe god exist. Once once takes the title of theist then on has > > > > > crossed the endzone line in my football metaphore. Freethinking > > > > > ends...on that issue. > > > > > > the·ism [ th ìzzəm ] (plural the·isms) > > > > > > noun > > > > > > Definition: > > > > > > 1. belief in God: belief that one God created and rules humans and the > > > > > world, not necessarily accompanied by belief in divine revelation such > > > > > as through the Bible > > > > > > 2. belief in god or gods: belief in the existence of a god or gods > > > > > > [Late 17th century. < Greek theos "god"] > > > > > > the·ist noun > > > > > > stemcell > > > > > > On Oct 29, 11:53 pm, ornamentalmind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > “YES it is. One has reached a conclusion. That thology might entail > > > > > > a > > > > > > tea pot, it might entail a man with a beard, a woman with 7 arms, > > > > > > etc. > > > > > > IF YOU ARE A THEIST....you are NOT a freethinker. Period! End of > > > > > > discussion...” - stem > > > > > > > My my stem, so, you consider a statement BY FIAT to require some > > > > > > sort > > > > > > of process of thinking, some analysis that reaches “a conclusion”? > > > > > > OK, > > > > > > I’ll play. (By fiat…) > > > > > > > All theists are free thinkers, end of discussion! > > > > > > > Geee, that felt good! We should play this more often! We might begin > > > > > > to believe in pink unicorns! Irony aside, dogma is dogma. > > > > > > > On Oct 29, 7:04 pm, stem cell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Orn. said >>> Is saying by fiat that theists are > > > > > > > not freethinkers ‘freethought’? <<< > > > > > > > > YES it is. One has reached a conclusion. That thology might > > > > > > > entail a > > > > > > > tea pot, it might entail a man with a beard, a woman with 7 arms, > > > > > > > etc. IF YOU ARE A THEIST....you are NOT a freethinker. Period! > > > > > > > End > > > > > > > of discussion... > > > > > > > > On Oct 29, 5:26 pm, ornamentalmind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > “I believe the process of freethought cannot lead to theism > > > > > > > > therefor a > > > > > > > > theist is not a freethinker. I have also stated..... I believe > > > > > > > > freethinking can lead to atheism as it did for me, or something > > > > > > > > else, > > > > > > > > perhaps agnosticism which is perfectly > > > > > > > > acceptable.” - clog > > > > > > > > “I find it satisfactory to state that a theist is not a > > > > > > > > freethinker. > > > > > > > > If someone aspires to be a theist then he is abandoning his > > > > > > > > freethought and should be regarded as…” – clog > > > > > > > > > To nit pick socratically, is a belief ‘freethought’? Is finding > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > notion satisfactory ‘freethought’? Is saying by fiat that > > > > > > > > theists are > > > > > > > > not freethinkers ‘freethought’? > > > > > > > > > On Oct 29, 3:09 pm, Clogtowner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi y'all - I have stated....... I believe the process of > > > > > > > > > freethought > > > > > > > > > cannot lead to theism therefor a theist is not a freethinker. > > > > > > > > > I have > > > > > > > > > also stated..... I believe freethinking can lead to atheism > > > > > > > > > as it did > > > > > > > > > for me, or something else, perhaps agnosticism which is > > > > > > > > > perfectly > > > > > > > > > acceptable. > > > > > > > > > The next point is do we nitpick where freethought changes to > > > > > > > > > blind > > > > > > > > > faith? It is probably a pointless exercise - there is some > > > > > > > > > point at > > > > > > > > > which a recovering faith follower becomes a freethinker. Do > > > > > > > > > we need to > > > > > > > > > identify that point? I suppose it is helpful for the > > > > > > > > > Prethinker but, > > > > > > > > > for our purposes, I find it satisfactory to state that a > > > > > > > > > theist is not > > > > > > > > > a freethinker. > > > > > > > > > If someone aspires to be a theist then he is abandoning his > > > > > > > > > freethought and should be regarded as........... I refuse to > > > > > > > > > terminate > > > > > > > > > this sentence. > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 29, 4:28 pm, stem cell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > OK. Correct if wrong. A theist cannot use the PROCESS of > > > > > > > > > > freethought? In the next sentence you said that that same > > > > > > > > > > process > > > > > > > > > > "leads elsewhere for others". > > > > > > > > > > > WHAT? A theist can use freethought up to and until he > > > > > > > > > > concludes there > > > > > > > > > > is a god...correct? But can an aspiring theist be a > > > > > > > > > > freethinker? I > > > > > > > > > > think you feel that, yes, that is correct. > > > > > > > > > > > stemcell > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 29, 4:08 pm, Clogtowner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi y'all - I'm saying (yet again) that the process of > > > > > > > > > > > freethought > > > > > > > > > > > cannot lead to theism. For me the process of freethought > > > > > > > > > > > led to > > > > > > > > > > > atheism but I accept that it leads elsewhere for others. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 29, 2:26 pm, stem cell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > So Clog. are you saying that a theist is a > > > > > > > > > > > > freethinker...just > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Memphis Freethought Alliance" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
