Naturalism is a view WITHIN a topic. Only the very ignorant see it as a proper view outside the topic it addresses. This is a common layman tendency in just about anything being addressed. When we look at the cause end of this universe it is addressed through natural science only to the boundaries of natural. To fully understand the universe and its origin it is necessary to go a step further. One must address pre physics. What caused first movement when there was nothing to move? There is an answer accepted in physics but it is a formulation before the nature of physics as we understand it. Hypothetical? True. But hypothesis is absolutely essential to physics.
http://niggerwise.com On Nov 4, 2:17 pm, stem cell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was listening to this podcast today and thought it would be a good > topic to discuss. I would like to get personal thoughts on this from > Orn. and Aaron. I hope this link goes through. Just FYI. More > information on this can be found atwww.naturalism.org. > > www.pointofinquiry.org/john_shook_naturalism_and_the_scientific_outlook/ > > stemcell --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Memphis Freethought Alliance" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
