Strange article. I don't mind the idea of having a hot  president that lets 
her kids suck on her titties but not one who is stupid and  thinks the world is 
five thousand years old and speaks in tongues in the oval  office before 
pressing the nuclear button just cannot  happen.
 
J.
 
 



Angelia, I assume you mean the following article from  11/4???



November 4, 2008


Feminists are upset by  Palin


My life has been (and continues to be) absolutely chocked  full of
bountiful blessings. One of the best blessings was spending all of  my
teenage years during the "Fabulous '50s" right here in Jackson.

I  grew up in a crime-free, drug-free environment where women were
treasured,  and assured that in America you could "go for the gold."

I was  super-idealistic, anticipating what was ahead for me as a young
woman. And,  just as I entered adulthood, WHAM! Along came the
salacious and sleazy '60s  with the birth of active feminism, leaving
traditional women like me aghast  at their antics.

Decrying what they deemed as oppression of women  during the '50's,
these newly acclaimed feminists took to the airwaves and  streets in
droves, demanding equal rights with men.

Touting a  concerted agenda to sock-it-to all males, these boisterious
old broads with  their butch looks burned their bras in public bonfires
at protest rallies.  Other "hippie" feminists descended on open-air,
farm-field rock concerts to  "make love and not war."

Then, there emerged the "Hillary" brand of  feminists. These were the
heady, new-age, lesbians and socialists, fresh  out of their Ivy-League
colleges, and fully-loaded with Marxist principles.  Even though these
Hillary types didn't shed their undies or wallow in the  drug-infested
hippie cesspools, they showed up in corporate offices and  boardrooms
in numbers (sans any glamour) to threaten their male  counterparts.

These were the in-your-face, brash old gals, who if  married kept their
maiden names. Radical feminist organizations popped up  like weeds.
They existed solely to rally their ilk and sue any company that  dared
to promote a qualified man if any woman - qualified or not -  was
around. It was a scary time for men and traditional  women.

Eventually, these disgusting females were integrated into the  work
force, where they were just tolerated as a nuisance rather than  an
asset. However, during this time, these radical feminists  unknowingly
and unintentionally brought attention to the many smart,  deserving
traditional working women, who looked like dreams compared to  their
nightmare feminist co-workers.

Out of this "dreamy" group  emerged the Sarah Palins. So, instead of
celebrating Palin's place in a  "man's world," today's feminists are
trashing her roundly. Here's why  radical feminists hate Palin. It's
all about her fashions, family, faith,  fortitude, fortune and fame.

Fashion-wise, she's a beautiful,  all-woman. The former beauty queen
has drop-dead looks from her shiny  tresses to her polished toes. Next,
there's her family. How dare a powerful  woman produce and breast-feed
five kids?

Third, Palin's faith really  galls feminists. She is a born-again,
baptized, evangelical believer in  Jesus, and she's not ashamed of the
gospel of Christ. She knows that all  life begins at conception. To the
glory of God, she bore her Down syndrome  baby rather than abort him,
like 90 percent of Down Syndrome babies are  aborted.

Fortitude is Palin's forte. She is a well-rounded,  multi-tasking, hard-
working mom, who doesn't flinch when she needs to make  tough calls.
And likewise, feminists detest her fortune and fame. Palin is  filthy
rich in all the things that really matter. She's spiritually saved  and
secure, culturally grounded in mainstream values and  intellectually
astute to moral imperatives that are biblically  sound.

Currently, the greatest insult to feminists is Palin's fame. She  is
now a historical woman - the first Republican female to run on  a
national presidential ticket., and she's soft and warm to  boot.

Sarah Palin may not win the national vice presidential slot, but  she
will win in Madison County and Tennessee (my home turf), and this  fact
just "warms the cockles of my heart!"

Jessalyn Bailey is a  registered nurse and a native Jacksonian. Write
to her at The Jackson Sun,  P.O. Box 1059, Jackson, TN 38302 or you can
send an e-mail to  [EMAIL PROTECTED] Log onto jacksonsun.com and
share your thoughts on  this  column.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--



On  Nov 10, 10:59 am, "Angelia Stinnett"  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Please, please,  please!!!!! go to the Jackson Sun's website and look up
> Jecilyn  Bailey's latest column. It has pissed be off like no other and
> please  leave comments and write letters to the editor about how it's the
>  equivalent of blatant racism.www.jacksonsun.com
>
> Send letters  to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> When people make racist comments, we  speak up. When people make sexist
> statements, we usually do nothing.  Please speak up for women. They reject
> what I write sometimes as they  should have done on the mentioned column.
>
>  Thanks!
>
> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Liz Purkrabek  
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>
>
> >  http://www.feministing.com/archives/011876.html
>
> >  *National Review**: Women who don't support Palin are just upset about
>  > their abortions*
>
> > Now  
this<http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MTA0YjdjZDc2OTVlNmM1YmE1YTY4ODRl...>is
  rich. Kevin Burke, a proponent of the invented
> > "post abortion  
syndrome,"<http://www.feministing.com/archives/006386.html>writes that  the 
criticism of Sarah Palin
> > *"may have a relationship to the  collective grief, shame, and guilt from
> > personal involvement in  the abortion of an unborn child."* Here I thought
> > voters made  decisions based on the issues that matter to them - little 
did I
> >  know that women across the country who don't support Palin are simply
>  > depressed about all of those abortions we've been having!
>
>  > Burke gets even classier when he brings Palin's pregnant teen daughter  
into
> > the mix:
>
> > If Bristol Palin had quietly  aborted, Sarah Palin would have been spared
> > the politically  untimely focus on this very personal family issue. The
> > problem  would have quietly gone away. But Bristol, like countless post
> >  abortive women, would have paid a high price to protect her mother from  
the
> > political heat that her pregnancy brings to the campaign. We  know from 
our
> > work with thousands of women who feel pressured to  abort for various 
reasons
> > that she would surely suffer many of  the common post-abortion symptoms;
> > depression, promiscuity, drug  and alcohol abuse, sleep disorders, and
> > relational problems. But  she would have suffered in silence; no one would
> > know her secret.  No one would acknowledge that she has reason to grieve 
or
> > have  symptoms after abortion. Sarah Palin would have lost not only her
> >  precious grandchild...she likely would have lost her daughter Bristol to 
 the
> > silent ravages of post abortion suffering.
>
>  > Wow, given that one in three American women will have an  
abortion<http://www.guttmacher.org/in-the-know/incidence.html>in her  lifetime 
- there must 
be millions of tired, addicted, slutty,
> >  depressed, single women running around voting Democrat!
>
> >  Seriously, conservatives need to get their heads out of their asses -  
and
> > out of our uteruses. (Sorry, *not* the best  visual.)
>
> > Posted by Jessica  <http://www.feministing.com/profiles/1> - October 29,
> > 2008,  at 11:45AM <http://www.feministing.com/archives/011876.html> |  in
> > Election <http://www.feministing.com/election/> ,  
Politics<http://www.feministing.com/politics/>, Reproductive
>  > Rights <http://www.feministing.com/reproductive-rights/>- Hide  quoted 
text -
>
> - Show quoted text  -


**************AOL Search: Your one stop for directions, recipes and all other 
Holiday needs. Search Now. 
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1212792382x1200798498/aol?redir=http://searchblog.aol.com/2008/11/04/happy-holidays-from
-aol-search/?ncid=emlcntussear00000001)

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Memphis Freethought Alliance" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to