Five gobblers? One was enough for me...whew! I think I would have lost my fragile mind...probably has to roll said boobs up and duct tape them to her chest to approximate breasts:) Bet they drug it with benadryl...not that I would know about that from experience:)
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 9:13 PM, Liz Purkrabek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > I have to wonder if she is breastfeeding the last baby. I imagine there > could be some serious feeding issues, especially since every time I see the > child it's stone cold unconscious. > > > > Liz > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of * > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* Monday, November 10, 2008 6:28 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: Women who don't support Palin are just upset about their > abortions > > > > *Strange article. I don't mind the idea of having a hot president that > lets her kids suck on her titties but not one who is stupid and thinks the > world is five thousand years old and speaks in tongues in the oval office > before pressing the nuclear button just cannot happen.* > > > > *J.* > > > > > > > Angelia, I assume you mean the following article from 11/4??? > > > > November 4, 2008 > > > Feminists are upset by Palin > > > My life has been (and continues to be) absolutely chocked full of > bountiful blessings. One of the best blessings was spending all of my > teenage years during the "Fabulous '50s" right here in Jackson. > > I grew up in a crime-free, drug-free environment where women were > treasured, and assured that in America you could "go for the gold." > > I was super-idealistic, anticipating what was ahead for me as a young > woman. And, just as I entered adulthood, WHAM! Along came the > salacious and sleazy '60s with the birth of active feminism, leaving > traditional women like me aghast at their antics. > > Decrying what they deemed as oppression of women during the '50's, > these newly acclaimed feminists took to the airwaves and streets in > droves, demanding equal rights with men. > > Touting a concerted agenda to sock-it-to all males, these boisterious > old broads with their butch looks burned their bras in public bonfires > at protest rallies. Other "hippie" feminists descended on open-air, > farm-field rock concerts to "make love and not war." > > Then, there emerged the "Hillary" brand of feminists. These were the > heady, new-age, lesbians and socialists, fresh out of their Ivy-League > colleges, and fully-loaded with Marxist principles. Even though these > Hillary types didn't shed their undies or wallow in the drug-infested > hippie cesspools, they showed up in corporate offices and boardrooms > in numbers (sans any glamour) to threaten their male counterparts. > > These were the in-your-face, brash old gals, who if married kept their > maiden names. Radical feminist organizations popped up like weeds. > They existed solely to rally their ilk and sue any company that dared > to promote a qualified man if any woman - qualified or not - was > around. It was a scary time for men and traditional women. > > Eventually, these disgusting females were integrated into the work > force, where they were just tolerated as a nuisance rather than an > asset. However, during this time, these radical feminists unknowingly > and unintentionally brought attention to the many smart, deserving > traditional working women, who looked like dreams compared to their > nightmare feminist co-workers. > > Out of this "dreamy" group emerged the Sarah Palins. So, instead of > celebrating Palin's place in a "man's world," today's feminists are > trashing her roundly. Here's why radical feminists hate Palin. It's > all about her fashions, family, faith, fortitude, fortune and fame. > > Fashion-wise, she's a beautiful, all-woman. The former beauty queen > has drop-dead looks from her shiny tresses to her polished toes. Next, > there's her family. How dare a powerful woman produce and breast-feed > five kids? > > Third, Palin's faith really galls feminists. She is a born-again, > baptized, evangelical believer in Jesus, and she's not ashamed of the > gospel of Christ. She knows that all life begins at conception. To the > glory of God, she bore her Down syndrome baby rather than abort him, > like 90 percent of Down Syndrome babies are aborted. > > Fortitude is Palin's forte. She is a well-rounded, multi-tasking, hard- > working mom, who doesn't flinch when she needs to make tough calls. > And likewise, feminists detest her fortune and fame. Palin is filthy > rich in all the things that really matter. She's spiritually saved and > secure, culturally grounded in mainstream values and intellectually > astute to moral imperatives that are biblically sound. > > Currently, the greatest insult to feminists is Palin's fame. She is > now a historical woman - the first Republican female to run on a > national presidential ticket., and she's soft and warm to boot. > > Sarah Palin may not win the national vice presidential slot, but she > will win in Madison County and Tennessee (my home turf), and this fact > just "warms the cockles of my heart!" > > Jessalyn Bailey is a registered nurse and a native Jacksonian. Write > to her at The Jackson Sun, P.O. Box 1059, Jackson, TN 38302 or you can > send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Log onto jacksonsun.com and > share your thoughts on this column. > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > On Nov 10, 10:59 am, "Angelia Stinnett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Please, please, please!!!!! go to the Jackson Sun's website and look up > > Jecilyn Bailey's latest column. It has pissed be off like no other and > > please leave comments and write letters to the editor about how it's the > > equivalent of blatant racism.www.jacksonsun.com > > > > Send letters to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > When people make racist comments, we speak up. When people make sexist > > statements, we usually do nothing. Please speak up for women. They reject > > what I write sometimes as they should have done on the mentioned column. > > > > Thanks! > > > > On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Liz Purkrabek <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > http://www.feministing.com/archives/011876.html > > > > > *National Review**: Women who don't support Palin are just upset about > > > their abortions* > > > > > Now this< > http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MTA0YjdjZDc2OTVlNmM1YmE1YTY4ODRl...>is > rich. Kevin Burke, a proponent of the invented > > > "post abortion syndrome,"< > http://www.feministing.com/archives/006386.html>writes that the criticism > of Sarah Palin > > > *"may have a relationship to the collective grief, shame, and guilt > from > > > personal involvement in the abortion of an unborn child."* Here I > thought > > > voters made decisions based on the issues that matter to them - little > did I > > > know that women across the country who don't support Palin are simply > > > depressed about all of those abortions we've been having! > > > > > Burke gets even classier when he brings Palin's pregnant teen daughter > into > > > the mix: > > > > > If Bristol Palin had quietly aborted, Sarah Palin would have been > spared > > > the politically untimely focus on this very personal family issue. The > > > problem would have quietly gone away. But Bristol, like countless post > > > abortive women, would have paid a high price to protect her mother from > the > > > political heat that her pregnancy brings to the campaign. We know from > our > > > work with thousands of women who feel pressured to abort for various > reasons > > > that she would surely suffer many of the common post-abortion symptoms; > > > depression, promiscuity, drug and alcohol abuse, sleep disorders, and > > > relational problems. But she would have suffered in silence; no one > would > > > know her secret. No one would acknowledge that she has reason to grieve > or > > > have symptoms after abortion. Sarah Palin would have lost not only her > > > precious grandchild...she likely would have lost her daughter Bristol > to the > > > silent ravages of post abortion suffering. > > > > > Wow, given that one in three American women will have an abortion< > http://www.guttmacher.org/in-the-know/incidence.html>in her lifetime - > there must be millions of tired, addicted, slutty, > > > depressed, single women running around voting Democrat! > > > > > Seriously, conservatives need to get their heads out of their asses - > and > > > out of our uteruses. (Sorry, *not* the best visual.) > > > > > Posted by Jessica <http://www.feministing.com/profiles/1> - October > 29, > > > 2008, at 11:45AM <http://www.feministing.com/archives/011876.html> | > in > > > Election <http://www.feministing.com/election/> , Politics< > http://www.feministing.com/politics/>, Reproductive > > > Rights <http://www.feministing.com/reproductive-rights/>- Hide quoted > text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > ">Search Now. > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Memphis Freethought Alliance" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
