Liz, assuming you are going to be speaking in front of an audience of
Christians, an interesting notion many of said faith seem to hold is
that IF a ‘baby’ dies before birth, they go immediately to heaven. For
these people, it can be said that to cause abortions is doing all such
potential lives a service, a favor. Assured eternal life in heaven.
Perhaps every conception should be aborted? ; - )



On Nov 10, 8:43 pm, "Liz Purkrabek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm making an outline of talking points for Wednesday night.  I haven't
> finished the last two questions, although I know what I am going to say.  I
> would go ahead and type it out, but I am tired and have a test tomorrow.  I
> need to get some shuteye!
>
> Let me know if there are any other points I need to keep in consideration.
> I'm sure there are many.
>
> See below:
>
> Vox Faith Forum Questions
>
> 1.       When do you believe life begins?  
>
> a.       Inadequate question
>
>                                                               i.      Sperm
> and egg already alive
>
>                                                             ii.      No more
> life before sperm and egg join
>
> 1.      Not suddenly "life plus" (no addition of soul)
>
>                                                           iii.      More
> important question would be when is life developed to the point of deserving
> rights
>
> 1.      Subject of emergency contraception need not include discussions of
> rights or suffering since fertilized egg may be only passed without adhering
> to uterine wall before nervous system developed
>
>                                                           iv.      If there
> is a question of combined DNA
>
> 1.      Exists in unconscious cells of human body (flaky skin cells,
> epithelial tissue of mouth, etc.) that is constantly being shed
>
> a.       Body cells share as much consciousness as newly fertilized eggs.
>
>                                                             v.      Arguing
> that fertilized egg holds "potential" baby is misleading
>
> 1.      Almost every cell of human body is potential baby in the age of
> cloning
>
> 2.      "Scratching you nose destroys millions of potential babies."
>
> 3.      Imagining a future life for a newly fertilized egg is creating make
> believe scenario that wrongly misleads, making one feel that a tragedy has
> occurred
>
> a.       Life imagined was not destroyed.  
>
> b.      Life imagined for embryo is of the mind and values of the one
> imagining
>
> 2.       What is a desirable place to intercept pregnancy?  
>
> a.       Preferably condoms or other forms of safe and effective birth
> control will prevent the sperm from meeting egg and the need for emergency
> birth control
>
> b.      If conception occurs, emergency birth control that prevents
> conception or implantation is preferable to medical procedure of abortion
>
>                                                               i.      Less
> physical (the least complicated procedure the better) and emotional strain
> on the woman (from cultural stigma relating to abortion, not regret for
> having the procedure)
>
> c.       If implantation is allowed to occur, pregnancy should be terminated
> ASAP
>
>                                                               i.      First
> trimester abortion procedure less complicated and less expensive
>
>                                                             ii.
> Earliest intervention as possible insures that issues of fetal suffering or
> denial of personhood do not develop
>
> 3.       Do you feel that dispensing emergency contraception leads people to
> more reckless sexual behavior?
>
> a.       Absolutely not
>
>                                                               i.      Women
> who would seek out EC most likely proactive personalities to begin with
>
> 1.      EC would be used when primary measure (condoms, etc.) fails
>
>                                                             ii.
> Numerous studies report no increase in transfer of STDs or other indicator
> of risky sexual behavior.
>
> 1.      (references)
>
>                                                           iii.      Do a
> simple Google search
>
> 1.      Numerous studies show no increase in risky behavior
>
> 2.      Few to no objective evidence to suggest otherwise
>
> b.      Maybe a few people would become engaged in risky behavior because
> they might decide to rely on EC
>
>                                                               i.      I
> would imagine not statistically significant number
>
>                                                             ii.      Those
> people likely to engage in risky sexual behavior anyway
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Memphis Freethought Alliance" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to