Is there really a point to asking specific questions about technical details right now? I mean, has any code even been written yet or is the exact plan that clear. It's like some new movie has been announced and before the script is even written people are asking who is going to be the lead actor.
I cannot stress enough, as people worry, Merb is open source. It's not going anywhere. DataMapper is its own project. It's still there. If Rails 3 doesn't satisfy me, for instance, I'll use Merb and put a community together to keep it going. This is why open source and free software is GOOD. On Dec 24, 11:06 am, Michael Klishin <[email protected]> wrote: > On 24.12.2008, at 21:52, Rue the Ghetto wrote: > > > 1) What is the process going to be like for adapting existing Merb > > plugins to the hybrid framework? > > Right now all the discussions involve keeping compatibility as much as > we can. It is sometimes good, sometimes bad. We will see how it goes > in the future. > > > 2) Can slices be used in Rails 3? And if so wow will slices have to > > be changed to fit in? > > Slices/engines/you name it will be one of the crown jewels for Rails > 3.0. Most ideas I heard of so far come from what slices taught us > through Merb's evolution. > > > 3) Will there be a performance hit for using legacy rails plugins? > > It depends on how your plugin is written. No framework can speed up > slow code that comes from 3rd parties. > > MK --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "merb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
