Joseph, before we answer this, you have got to promise not to resend the entire Digest anymore with your questions!
John Freer On 7/20/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > RE: If you want the best of both worlds (from a 124 chassis fanatic's > viewpoint, anyway), the '95 E300D would be it. Same motor as the '96/'97 > 210 chassis car, in the 124 chassis. Most people that have one love > them. And I will agree that the non-turbo 606 drives like an earlier > turbodiesel, without the lag and turbo whine. I have to imagine a turbo > 606 is pretty close to nirvana with 177 HP and 244 lb. ft. of torque. > > A listing from the STAR (Nov/Dec 1997) shows engine # OM606 is identified > with Chassis # 140, Sales Designation S300D Turbo, built in years 1996-. > > The listing also shows engine # OM605 as identified with Chassis # 210, > Sales Designation E250D, built in years 1996-. > > Also, engine # OM606 is identified with Chassis #210, Sales Designation > E300D, built in years 1996-. > > Can anybody make sense out of this? > > Joseph > >
