andrew strasfogel wrote:
Gary,

Enjoy your new cars but BE SKEPTICAL OF THE M1 HYPE!
Unless 1) you live in an extreme climate (Phoenix or Winnipeg, e.g.),
2) plan on keeping both cars forever, AND 3) will do the sort of
driving that allows you to take advantage of the extended oil change
benefit afforded by Mobil 1, you'll probably do just fine with ANY
Mercedes-Benz approved ordinary motor oil.

Strasfogel fails to understand (or at least misstates) the biggest benefits of Mobil synthetic oils (but his caution to be skeptical is prudent). There are circumstances where a cost benefit analysis will PROVE conventional oil to be the better value, but they involve almost exclusively situations where a car/truck is driven almost entirely on the highway in good weather with MANY tens or even hundreds of miles between cold starts. Then a conventional oil with an extended change interval is likely to offer better service when all the costs are considered.

It is true that your engine CAN last a VERY long time using conventional oil. It is also true that many types of engine wear are reduced (halved or better) when using Mobil 1 oil vs conventional oil (all else being equal).

Most modern Mercedes diesel engines DON'T wear out. Most break or are discarded because something else breaks or wears out. Still, reduced engine wear WILL result in faster and more reliable starting, less need for engine maintenance and hence lower maintenance cost (you CAN even usually go longer between valve adjustments) your battery will likely last longer, you will use marginally less fuel and consume somewhat less oil. Timing chains will last TWICE as long before they require changing. In OM61x engines (like yours), timing chains often lasted less than 200kmi before requiring replacement - that interval could easily be doubled if Mobil 1 were used for the life of the engine. In OM60x engines, typically chain life was already almost double that of an OM61x engine by design, which could mean a chain wouldn't need changing until the engine turned 700-800kmi if Mobil 1 had been used from the start. In my own cars (all change to Mobil 1 at between 100-200kmi) I estimate the chains will probably require replacement at between 500-700kmi (at the present rate of wear) but that will be determined finally by MEASURING chain stretch. Cylinder wall wear MAY or may NOT be reduced by Mobil 1 (or other synthetics) but then cylinder wall wear in Mercedes engines is already a minor factor - it is USUAL for the original factory honing marks to still be visible on the cylinder walls of Mercedes engines (gas AND diesels) even after 500,000 or more miles.

It's generally agreed that cold start wear is cut by more than half when Mobil synthetic oils are used. Timing chain wear is reduced by half. Lifter noise in OM60x engine will be reduced (often even eliminated) if it's already started and may not start or will start MUCH later if it hasn't started. The engine will crank faster in ANY weather (particularly apparent in VERY cold weather) and will start sooner and in colder weather. This is the most obvious sign that will be obvious to the unsophisticated user - it's DIRECTLY proportional to the reduction in friction and that's been reported to be 25-60% (I've never experience more than a 40% increase in starter speed - the full extent of this increase is NOT instantaneous, but requires a little time to develop). This will result in about a 10 degree drop in the lowest temperature at which the car will start without using the block heater or some other starting aid, but the REAL benefit is the reduced friction and thus reduced wear.

If you disregard minor cost differences (labor is the major cost of most oil changes - not the cost of the oil) or want lowest possible wear or don't want lifter clatter on OM60x diesels - Mobil 1 WILL come out ahead most of the time. Most other so called synthetics (those composed mostly of group III base stock) like the ones marketed in the US by Shell, Valvoline, Quaker State, Castrol, etc. are slightly to significantly superior to conventional oil in different characteristics but substantially inferior to what I call the REAL synthetic formulas that consist entirely of blends of group IV and V oils (Mobil and Amsoil synthetics are the most widely marketed of these in the US).

Mobil 1 synthetics can provide substantial benefits, but the engines can still deliver FINE service when approved conventional oils are used prudently. You pays your money and makes your choice.

Marshall
--
          Marshall Booth (who doesn't respond to unsigned questions)
      "der Dieseling Doktor" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
'87 300TD 181Kmi,'87 190D 2.5 199Kmi, '84 190D 2.2 227Kmi, '85 190D 2.0 159Kmi, '87 190D 2.5 turbo 234kmi
      Diesel Technical Advisor MBCA, member GWSection
    http://www.dhc.net/~pmhack/mercedes/mbooth1.htm


Reply via email to